Keep prompts temporary
Prompts and tool-specific context help an agent work in the moment, but they are not a reliable repository record. Preserve the decisions and evidence that another contributor must be able to audit.
Answer page
Use coding assistants for implementation; keep the durable implementation contract and evidence in versioned repository files.
Direct answer
Codex or Claude Code can explore, implement, and explain changes. The repository should retain the durable agreement: specification, task scope, target paths, validation, implementation summary, and reconciliation. That makes the workflow portable across agents and reviewers.
Practical guidance
Prompts and tool-specific context help an agent work in the moment, but they are not a reliable repository record. Preserve the decisions and evidence that another contributor must be able to audit.
Task definitions make the allowed change boundary and validation visible in code review. They can be read by any coding agent without requiring the original tool, model, or conversation.
A human still resolves ambiguous product intent, risk, and conflicting evidence. The workflow makes that judgment traceable instead of treating model output as approval.
Verified demo evidence
$ day-shift init
Created .day-shift workspace
Next: run day-shift doctorAuthorship and sources
Keep exploring
A concrete view of the repository artifacts that make human-agent implementation work traceable and reviewable.
Read nextMake coding-agent work reviewable with bounded repository artifacts, named validation, and written implementation evidence.
Read nextFrequently asked questions about Day Shift's repository-native workflow role.
Read nextFind your answer
Search the answer pages, concept, comparisons, demo, and FAQ without leaving the site.
Search by a problem, workflow step, or tool boundary.